officialhome:

the-arsonists-lullaby:

You have no right to invalidate a sexuality just because you don’t understand it

memeufacturing:

birthday
january: nut
february: dong
march: giraffe
april: gogu
may: anime
june: jokes
july: aaaaaaaaa
august: police
september: shit
october: kinkshame
november: kawaii
december: fuck

first letter of first name
a-c: smoker
d-f: fucker
g-i: succ
j-m: puncher
n-q: shamer
r-u: phobe
v: ender
wxyz: eater

day of birthday
1-10: 69
11-20: 420
21-28: 666
29-31: 184847388467374

qlowcloudy:

when you go on amazon or other shopping sites, there’s an option to filter your results. you can choose to only view items that are under a certain category and in a certain price range.

everyone has “filters” that they use when determining whether or not they’re attracted to someone, either physically or emotionally. someone’s filters could look like this: [gender: female] > [age: 15-17] > [height: any] > [habits: doesn’t smoke or drink] > [interested in: literature, film]

but if this person were pansexual, it would look like this: [gender: any] > [age: 15-17] > [height: any] > [habits: doesn’t smoke or drink] > [interested in: literature, film]. it’s the same exact thing, just without the gender filter.

it’s a really common misconception that since pan folk don’t care about gender, we literally don’t have any preferences. but that’s not at all true — we’re just indifferent to gender. also that second example is my own so hmu