sjws-against-anime:

hale-hortler:

sjws-against-anime:

hale-hortler:

sjws-against-anime:

hale-hortler:

sjws-against-anime:

hale-hortler:

anti-sjw-pro-gardevoir:

lovely-luxray:

mama-germany:

switch-up-snowfox:

breastforce:

there is no way this woman is heterosexual.

please. don’t start.

Literally pinpoint what in this screenshot makes it absolutely clear that Sombra is not straight.

THEY ALREADY STARTED

I HATE THE OW FANDOM

SO MUCH

Jfcc

“hey she’s gay so you can’t have her see she looks gay so she is gay okay straight people can’t have her”

Way to make the LGBT community look sooo not clingy, Tumblr.

visual approximation of the anti-SJWs in this thread:

Way to not even try and refute my statement boyo.

Alright, your statement is a prime example of the vothadis fallacy.

Funny, because I can’t even find a result of that on Google. Try again when you have a better response.

Try “vothadis nuts”

I still have no idea what you’re trying to say. Unless it’s something in Russian that I can’t even translate, I can’t find it.

Found a page about it in one search.

The vothadis fallacy, also known as “vothadis nuts”, is a formal logical fallacy that intends to assert a joke or otherwise insincere comment as a statement of fact for the sake of an argument. Typically, this is done out of ignorance, but in some cases it can be attributed to willful dishonesty.

Is that a good enough refutation?