I finally finished painting my tabletop! I bought some cheap nesting tables at IKEA, and I didn’t like how they looked like TV trays, so I wanted to personalize them. I just need to wait a week before I can varnish it.
Teachers: Wikipedia is very unreliable *Hands out 25 year old textbooks instead*
Alrighty guys ,gals, and other genders and lack thereof I’m gonna teach ya a thing.
A lot of teachers will go on about not using wikipedia as a source.
“It’s bad,” they say. “I will deduct points if you do it.”
Well wikipedia is actually a great source of information and fuck what your teacher said, you absolutely can use it.
The key though is knowing
A.How to use it.
B. How to source it.
and
C. whether it is good info or trash.
NowFirst Lets look up something on wikipedia. Say your writing a paper on Gregor Mendel and Mendelian Inheritance.
So you zoom over to the Wikipedia page on Mendelian Inheritance.
Now there is a lot of information here. Not all of it is strictly necessary for that essay you are writing. So you read through and suddenly you see something that is good info for your essay.
Boy oh boy this information is useful. To bad your teacher said No Wikipedia Ever.
However there is a loophole.
It’s right there.
No. Go closer.
You see that little four? Its a citation number. Think of wikipedia as it’s own essay. It got it’s information from other sources out there. Just like you are trying to right now. And since there is a citation, it’s going to be listed at the end of the wikipedia article.
Look at citation number 4
Look at that you have your first citation. From Wikipedia.
And look. Do you see it. There is a link. It’s the blue words with the boxy arrow thingamajig.
That thing. Click it.
Why did you leave wikipedia you ask? Wikipedia is great. You have several sources from there. But There is more than what the put in to that wiki article. Those sources Wikipedia gave you are helpful. And now that you are at the source, you can utilize it.
But what if its a book that’s the source.
You can either head to your local library and see if they have it, order it, or avoid the book source. Online sources are just as valuable.
Also do not quote directly from the wikipedia. Quote from the source and then use quote citation.
And MLA citation. Use MLA citation. Since you are linked to the sources cite them. Not the wikipedia.
Your teacher will never know. And now you can finish that sweet essay you got planned.
You’re on your way to greatness.
^This. Valuable skills.^
One of the actual, real reasons to avoid wikipedia is that it’s something called a “tertiary source.” Primary sources are written by people who experience the event or situation firsthand, secondary sources are written by people who synthesize or elaborate on primary sources, and tertiary sources are indexes or compilations of secondary and primary sources, like dictionaries or encyclopedias. It’s not that they’re false or anything like that…it’s just that they’re the absolute entry-level information–they don’t really say anything new or original about anything, they just sort of present the information for easy perusal and quick reference. For almost any and every text worth writing, texts that writers write for a purpose or that enter into a true existing conversation about a topic, tertiary sources are at best a starting point–because if you’re only using tertiary sources, your own essay piece of writing is going to be shallow and uninspired af. At that point, practically speaking, you might as well just link your readers to the wikipedia article cuz you ain’t saying nothing new.
