tbh its weird reading radfem posts criticizing libfems as the only alternative to radfeminism. a good thing to keep in mind when writing discourse is that theres rarely only 2 options in those things. theres more than 2 lefts, etc. political ideologies (because feminism is political) can vary a lot. even if it seems like everyone who doesnt think the way you do thinks the same, they rarely do. lumping everything you disagree with under one label just isnt intellectually honest.

criticizing what you see as “the opposing side” as if it were a monolith isnt good either. & im p sure not two feminists (lib or rad or whatever) will have the same view of their feminism. listen to viewpoints you disagree with once in a while, its healthy.

1. whyinthewild liked this
2. actualfeminist liked this
3. lafememeistnoire reblogged this from forest-femme
4. lafememeistnoire liked this
5. importantunicorngardens reblogged this from forest-femme and added:

   ! I consider myself to be a libfem. However. I strongly disagree with they gender aspects of it and etc.

6. ordereduniverse liked this
7. fullmoondagger liked this
8. nicomrade reblogged this from forest-femme and added:

   adding ressources is a really nice move! thanks for your input on this!! i havent seen material feminism listed in the...

9. forest-femme reblogged this from nicomrade and added:

   This is actually pretty cool and a good point! I looked at a ton of different kinds of feminism before deciding I...

10. roublardise liked this
11. shsltxt liked this
12. the-space-enby reblogged this from nicomrade
13. the-space-enby liked this
14. sleeping-satan liked this
15. planetahmane liked this