Anonymous: so... what is womanhood/manhood when seen from a revolutionary perspective? Do you think gender would not exist in an anarchist society? I consider myself non-binary because I don't understand gender (which might be my autism, but surely if you look deep enough gender doesn't make sense?)

daggers-drawn:

Gender, as it stands, is an oppressive social tool that reinforces hierarchy by sorting children into gendered social classes with corresponding reproductive and social roles.

The logic of the system is that people are tools and should be sorted according to their usefulness into categories that (a) maintain order and (b) produce surplus (under capitalism, this is realized as “profit”).

It’s true that gender is based on biology, but it is wrong that this is innate. Gender implies social roles that have nothing to do with reproduction and children are often even surgically altered to fit their assigned reproductive roles better.

Also, reproduction is not the purpose of human beings. There is no purpose. Tools have purpose, humans just are. We just exist. 

Thus reproduction is also an assigned role, which is why so many people with uteri have trouble getting contraceptive surgery or other permanent medical contraception and why a large part of the conservative moral thrust is invested in the anti-abortion movement.

So then gender is not necessary. But that’s not to say binary trans people are “reinforcing gender” or some other horseshit. Quite the opposite, they are taking power from a system that attempts to make them its subjects and asserting their power of self-definition. This undermines a system that exists solely on its ability to assign gender to subjected people.

  1. an-average-sized-person reblogged this from an-average-sized-person
  2. pine-slapple reblogged this from an-average-sized-person
  3. riotraze reblogged this from shethecat
  4. shethecat reblogged this from zephyrthesquirrel
  5. zephyrthesquirrel reblogged this from daggers-drawn
  6. rednovember1917 reblogged this from daggers-drawn
  7. gold-cub reblogged this from daggers-drawn
  8. aliceopal reblogged this from daggers-drawn
  9. extradiol reblogged this from absentminded-potato
  10. ark-shifter reblogged this from daggers-drawn
  11. magnabat reblogged this from daggers-drawn
  12. absentminded-potato reblogged this from daggers-drawn
  13. split-at-the-seems said: …. if we are free to explore and determine our own relationship with gender or God or w/e, then those things are not problematic in and of themselves - it’s only when someone else decides “we’re this thing and fuck those other people” that it’s an issue - like America is always murdering folk in the name of “freedom” and “democracy” but those aren’t bad things at all, they use real things to lend themselves credibility but those aren’t the source of the problem
  14. split-at-the-seems said: I don’t really agree with that analysis because genders exist outside of and predate your definition - it’s just that binary model is dictated and imposed - I feel like I’m doing a lot of damage control atm because as people reject and start to resist the machinery of control, it’s very easy to throw entire concepts away without ever properly examining them - gender isn’t inherently wrong nor is religion, people asserting control over other people is the issue …
  15. dimefag reblogged this from daggers-drawn
  16. daggers-drawn reblogged this from daggers-drawn
  17. totallysaneoverlord reblogged this from daggers-drawn
  18. imeme2cope reblogged this from daggers-drawn
  19. all-the-good-bi-puns-were-taken reblogged this from daggers-drawn
  20. karl-barks reblogged this from daggers-drawn
  21. floatingstirnerhead reblogged this from daggers-drawn
  22. rileygrif reblogged this from daggers-drawn
(c)