butts-bouncing-on-the-beltway:

redmagus77:

kaylapocalypse:

thatadult:

The Stanford prison experiment tapes were so stupid when I watched them in AP psych and so stupid when I watch this film about them. Literally they could’ve all sat and played cards and got $15 a day to tell ghost stories all day and be best friends. But masculinity and whiteness and power created this violent irrationality that positioned young ass men to be met with brutality and trauma and disrespect even when it was obviously taken too far. and it makes no sense. If someone put me in a room with Black girls and said I would get paid $90 a day (that’s the equivalent apparently) to be a prison guard, do you know how fast I’d be sitting with them and learning about them and exchanging Instagrams and like.. sleeping.. like what the fuck was the point of any of that…

My psych teacher introduced us to this study and literally before she showed us was like “don’t ever confuse a study based on one type of person (white men/boys) to be an example of an Everyman situation. There is strong evidence that if this was recreated with diversity, or even just with girls, that the results would have been drastically different. This is an example of bias and sexism in the medical research community.”

“Other, more subtle factors also shaped the experiment. It’s often said that the study participants were ordinary guys—and they were, indeed, determined to be “normal” and healthy by a battery of tests. But they were also a self-selected group who responded to a newspaper advertisement seeking volunteers for “a psychological study of prison life.” In a 2007 study, the psychologists Thomas Carnahan and Sam McFarland asked whether that wording itself may have stacked the odds. They recreated the original ad, and then ran a separate ad omitting the phrase “prison life.” They found that the people who responded to the two ads scored differently on a set of psychological tests. Those who thought that they would be participating in a prison study had significantly higher levels of aggressiveness, authoritarianism, Machiavellianism, narcissism, and social dominance, and they scored lower on measures of empathy and altruism.”

http://www.newyorker.com/science/maria-konnikova/the-real-lesson-of-the-stanford-prison-experiment

The thing about this study is that whether or not it’s generalizable to the public is debatable at best.

But it’s certainly generalizable to the population of people who tend to be drawn to prison system and law enforcement jobs because that’s exactly the demographics that tend to show up in those positions.

  1. eraofthelostgirls reblogged this from littleladylatte
  2. sybilhallward reblogged this from toxicsugar
  3. littleladylatte reblogged this from thelauraborealis
  4. storyofthisnerd reblogged this from birthmarkedlikeacomet
  5. some-little-girl reblogged this from whatbigotspost
  6. parlophonerecords12 reblogged this from osmundpriestt
  7. librarybutterfly reblogged this from toxicsugar
  8. toxicsugar reblogged this from dioders
  9. bluelaceskies reblogged this from notyouraveragehalfdemon
  10. attic-gremlin reblogged this from osmundpriestt
  11. osmundpriestt reblogged this from breathingdestiel
  12. sadfandomtrash4ever reblogged this from breathingdestiel
  13. melancholymarch reblogged this from benjaminthecoathanger
  14. chiarosethereal reblogged this from rib0mbees
  15. lostperdue reblogged this from thankyousirmayihaveanother
  16. lilmimi101 reblogged this from dafeedil
  17. ctchtwentytwo reblogged this from dafeedil
  18. lavender-minutiae reblogged this from dafeedil
  19. vocallife reblogged this from all-hail-the-morrigan
  20. stn-skg reblogged this from iwasraisedfromperdition
  21. gwello reblogged this from heidi-is-keen
  22. theliteraltrashking reblogged this from luvblue177
  23. lokebrenna reblogged this from benjaminthecoathanger
  24. luvblue177 reblogged this from breathingdestiel
(c)