hooligan-nova:

marsinlibra:

hooligan-nova:

Is there any irony in people identifying themselves as rationalists inevitably becoming insular and cultish cliques focusing their unified critiques against the most vulnerable people in society, or is that just kind of the logical outcome of the intellectual elitism that comes with rationalist tradition?

The irony is this being posted by someone who supports the most cultish neoliberal post modern clique, trans activism, which is a hate movement against women and particularly lesbians.

Trans activists are like “Laverne Cox doesn’t have male privilege because his brother said so and Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, who is from Nigeria, needs to be more intersectional!” and “Butch lesbians have masculine privilege, lesbians who don’t sleep with trans women are murderous oppressors!”

This whole idea that men are more oppressed for the clothes they wear than women are for the way our bodies are exploited as resources globally is mind blowing and erases the experiences of the majority of the world’s women. It’s the ultimate western abstract pseudo intellectual attempt for male supremacists to feign caring about women.

Yeah they care about “women” so long as those “women” have dicks.

Hey is there like a world where literally anyone asked your opinion and can you go back?

  1. jonpertwee said: This fuck has tried shit with me before.
  2. kuraichi reblogged this from chauvinistsushi
  3. daggers-drawn said: I bloqued them but thank you
  4. chauvinistsushi reblogged this from daggers-drawn and added:
    This is literally harassment. They are literally harassing you. Im fkkn reporting
  5. nicomrade reblogged this from daggers-drawn
  6. torikaze said: there may have been quite some time ago, but certainly no longer
  7. noble-rot said: i think it’s very much par for the course
(c)