smol-cute-baby:

You ask where her evidence is, as if the pictures of bruises and screenshots of texts about him hitting her and witness accounts aren’t evidence. She gives you video evidence of him being drunk, violent, and her being absolutely terrified, and you say that she shouldn’t have filmed it, that she just made him angrier, that he never touched her in the video.

You don’t know what happened after the video cut off.

You don’t know what happens when she isn’t recording.

He doesn’t have to hit her to be abusive. The words that he is throwing at her are abuse in themselves.

“She was manipulating him by asking questions.” She asked him why he was drunk in the morning, why he drank an entire bottle of wine and decided to destroy their kitchen.

Right now, the available evidence really points, in my opinion, to her accusations being true, and by standing with the abuser instead of the victim, you are saying that it is a woman’s fault when she gets hit, that a woman should be content to live in fear of her husband, that abuse of all kinds is okay.

#ImWithAmberHeard

Side note: the fact that his ex-wife and his daughter call him a good man and say that he’s never been abusive to him means absolutely nothing. Abusers act very differently with different people; that’s a fact. I could give you a personal anecdote but I’d rather not.

2 years ago / 1737 
via: vava-chan-take-over-the-world
  1. fragile-luxury reblogged this from gotham-city-tales
  2. howlatabluemoon reblogged this from chasingshhadows
  3. gaykpopincluded reblogged this from tteonajimara
(c)