samanticshift:

samanticshift:

“i don’t judge people based on race, creed, color, or gender. i judge people based on spelling, grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure.”

i hate to burst your pretentious little bubble, but linguistic prejudice is inextricably tied to racism, sexism, classism, xenophobia, and ableism.


ETA: don’t send me angry messages about this…at all, preferably, but at least check the tag for this post before firing off an irate screed.

no one seems to be following the directive above, so here’s the version of this post i would like all you indignant folk to read.

no, i am not saying that people of color, women, poor people, disabled people, etc, “can’t learn proper english.” what i’m saying is that how we define “proper english” is itself rooted in bigotry. aave is not bad english, it’s a marginalized dialect which is just as useful, complex, and efficient as the english you’re taught in school. “like” as a filler word, valley girl speech, and uptalk don’t indicate vapidity, they’re common verbal patterns that serve a purpose. etc.

because the point of language is to communicate, and there are many ways to go about that. different communities have different needs; different people have different habits. so if you think of certain usages as fundamentally “wrong” or “bad,” if you think there’s a “pure” form of english to which everyone should aspire, then i challenge you to justify that view. i challenge you to explain why “like” makes people sound “stupid,” while “um” doesn’t raise the same alarms. explain the problem with the habitual be. don’t appeal to popular opinion, don’t insist that it just sounds wrong. give a detailed explanation.

point being that the concept of “proper english” is culturally constructed, and carries cultural biases with it. those usages you consider wrong? they aren’t. they’re just different, and common to certain marginalized groups.

not to mention that many people who speak marginalized dialects are adept at code-switching, i.e. flipping between non-standard dialects and “standard english,” which makes them more literate than most of the people complaining about this post.

not to mention that most of the people complaining about this post do not speak/write english nearly as “perfectly” as they’d like to believe and would therefore benefit by taking my side.

not to mention that the claim i’m making in the OP is flat-out not that interesting. this is sociolinguistics 101. this is the first chapter of your intro to linguistics textbook. the only reason it sounds so outlandish is that we’ve been inundated with the idea that how people speak and write is a reflection of their worth. and that’s a joyless, elitist idea you need to abandon if you care about social justice or, frankly, the beauty of language.

and yes, this issue matters. if we perceive people as lesser on the basis of language, we treat them as lesser. and yes, it can have real ramifications–in employment (tossing resumes with “black-sounding names”), in the legal system (prejudice against rachel jeantel’s language in the trayvon martin trial), in education (marginalizing students due to prejudice against dialectical differences, language-related disabilities, etc), and…well, a lot.

no, this doesn’t mean that there’s never a reason to follow the conventions of “standard english.” different genres, situations, etc, have different conventions and that’s fine. what it does mean, however, is that this standard english you claim to love so much has limited usefulness, and that, while it may be better in certain situations, it is not inherently better overall. it also means that non-standard dialects can communicate complex ideas just as effectively as the english you were taught in school. and it means that, while it’s fine to have personal preferences regarding language (i have plenty myself), 1) it’s worth interrogating the source of your preferences, and 2) it’s never okay to judge people on the basis of their language use.

so spare me your self-righteous tirades, thanks.

  1. dorotheian reblogged this from amastadonofconflict
  2. amastadonofconflict reblogged this from disregardingsanity
  3. cheesedeity reblogged this from il-coniglio-nero
  4. butch-hansolo reblogged this from norcumi
  5. il-coniglio-nero reblogged this from disregardingsanity
  6. sariahael reblogged this from robinasnyder
  7. disregardingsanity reblogged this from crazyasarocket
  8. iapetusneume reblogged this from magnetsorwhatever
  9. magnetsorwhatever reblogged this from lynati
  10. shadowedkitten reblogged this from dollsahoy
  11. zibelstardust reblogged this from robinasnyder
  12. deviousthinkers reblogged this from ashariajade
  13. house-regan-unite reblogged this from norcumi
  14. robinasnyder reblogged this from thymetraveler
  15. nevichaos reblogged this from norcumi
  16. ashariajade reblogged this from norcumi
  17. thymetraveler reblogged this from lynati
  18. ghostscostextra reblogged this from lynati
  19. dragon-in-spirit reblogged this from norcumi
  20. anescapistatheart reblogged this from norcumi
  21. bladeanddragon reblogged this from lynati
  22. crazyasarocket reblogged this from norcumi
  23. filiasyth reblogged this from norcumi
  24. snwfox reblogged this from norcumi
  25. lynati reblogged this from norcumi
  26. thriceandonce reblogged this from norcumi
  27. norcumi reblogged this from herecomesthesniperbutt
(c)